QuestionPro Blog

Excellent Articles and Thoughts on Customer Feedbackue

February 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment

There has been a lot going on in terms of customer feedback lately.  Today, I thought I would share a little link love and give you a quick overview of what other experts have been writing about when it comes to “customer feedback”

Customer Feedback Listening Posts: In my previous post about customer research trends, I mentioned that collecting feedback has gone far beyond the traditional phone, paper and even online surveys.  In this article, Jeff Henning does a terrific job of drilling down into several different customer feedback channels that you can use.

Expand Customer Feedback Ahead of Product Launch: Why is it that so many of us product development people feel like it’s easier to think about what the customer wants instead of just asking?  Morey Stettner has the right idea in this article.  Ask the customer these three simple questions: What is the problem?  What kind of product or service would you like to have?  What else?  The point here isn’t to be sophisticated, but to stop and take advantage of an opportunity to involve your customer in designing their next product or service.

Capitalizing on Customer Feedback – Creating Measurable Value from Voice of the Customer:  The Allegiance Blog has a newly issued white paper that covers new ways to think about customer feedback, top customer feedback strategies, four principles to realizing value from your voice of the customer research.  Download that one.

7 Tips for Getting Customer Feedback: You think you’ve got them all covered, but this is a great little checklist that you can use to see if you’re forgetting any of these handy customer feedback collection methods.

For Genuine Customer Insights, Go Beyond the Research:  More terrific ideas on ways and methods to gather insightful research without breaking the bank.

Recall Woes Prompt Toyota to Improve Customer Feedback Loop: Toyota has spent years building its reputation for quality and the last few months of quality issues and recalls leave them in a delicate position.  How will they use customer research and feedback to come back?

Well, I hope that you enjoyed this list of customer feedback articles.  Do you have articles you’d like to recommend, send them over and we’ll compile them to share with everyone.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

3 Ways to Measure Your Social Media Effectiveness

February 5, 2010 · 2 Comments

Let’s face it. Businesses and the left brained among us thrive on what can be measured.  Social Media, which can be wildly effective, can also be difficult to measure.  Social Media is about reaching the masses and leveraging networks.  Think of your Social Media strategy as you would paying for advertising for television. There is a huge potential to reach everyone, but the only way to truly know the effectiveness of a campaign is ultimately how many people respond to the message.

Here are three ways we can measure the success of a Social Media Campaign: Response, Reach, and Revenue

Response
An easy way to know if your message is attractive with an audience is by the response. Does your content resonate and inspire people to action? Are people responding directly to you in Social Media? Have you made room for them to respond? Are people walking in your door and visiting your site? If not, you may need to research the needs of your demographic and restructure your approach. Remember, that Social Media is not a lecture, it’s a conversation. Customers want interaction. The more you respond directly and share content that resonates, you’ll see an increase in your effectiveness.

Reach
Is anyone sharing your content?  Do people find your message and offerings valuable enough to share with the people they care about?  Twitter and Facebook have awesome sharing functionality. If no one is sharing your message, then your efforts are not bearing fruit.  Be sure that your content is attractive to a diverse audience, or if you have a select niche, be sure that you’ve created interesting content to share. It could be that you’re not connected to the right audience or need to tweak your communications. Keep the posts brief, interesting and provide links that can easily be shared.

Revenue
We all know that this is the BIG one. Ultimately, we need to see an increase in revenue. Response and reach can get us there. A good social media strategy will have people congregating around your content and buying your goods and services.  Website traffic, people coming into your business and hiring you for consulting are good measures.  Make sure that at the end of your social media breadcrumb trail, people have a clear call to action so they know what’s needed from them.

By beginning with the end and setting goals around Response, Reach and Revenue, you can build a Social Media Strategy that takes your business to the next level!

About the Author: If you’ve ever wondered how you’re going to build your brand using social media, then pay attention to our our guest columnist today. Staci J. Shelton is a social media expert and blogger who specializes in building and maximizing online relationships

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

Customer Research Trends for 2010

February 3, 2010 · 1 Comment

Trendwatching isn’t just for designers and marketing and design professionals.  Market researchers want to know what’s hot in the world of measuring customer experience as much as everyone else!

I’ve pulled together some of the new and trending ways that customers provide information and organizations collect it.

  1. Tracking Social Media Conversations.  Focus groups used to be the only way to get that special “voice and body language” of the customer without all the cost and logistics involved.  Social media applications provide a virtual “room” where the conversation is all about your company or product.  There are firms that specialize in this specialized kind of market research.
  2. Real time reviews. The growth of sites like YELP have emboldened customers to tell the world about what they love and what they don’t love about their latest customer experiences.  Organizations should take the opportunity to  have their own space or presence online where customers can connect directly with employees and give their feedback.  Respond to customer feedback and build your brand.
  3. Customers will want multiple levels and platforms for feedback.  In addition to your regular online surveys, be sure to provide a space where customers can offer their ideas.  IdeaScale is a great way to get customers involved in the product improvement and development process.  Customers who are involved in contributing their ideas are loyal customers and enthusiastic referrers.
  4. Sharing information across company departments. There are vendors and technologies that now allow you to track customer feedback across sources such as e-mails, call centers, blogs and comments online.  Check out ResponseTek, for example.  They provide an entire suite of services that will help you route important customer feedback to the appropriate department manager BEFORE they’ve left you for a competitor.
  5. Customer feedback is everyone’s job. An overarching trend is to have employees from across the organization carry social media accounts and interact with customers as they “chat” about your company, product or service.  Instead of having all the feedback run through one department, companies will find it necessary to create an infrastructure that allows the information to be collected, processed, reported and acted upon by key managers in each department.
  6. Moving away from score-keeping to experience improvement. Companies are spending less time obsessing about tracking scores and the movement of the scores on surveys and caring more about the open-ended responses that customers provide.  In other words, a score of 7 out of 10 doesn’t tell you what to do to improve an experience.  But 100 requests for 24/7 online customer support via chat is feedback you can do something about.

As you can tell by the six trends I’ve outlined here, there is an overarching shift away from surveys that happen in intervals of quarters or months to on-going conversations with customers in order to quickly and effectively improve the experience.

I had such an experience recently when I chatted with Marc Gingras, founder and CEO of Tungle.com (the new meeting scheduling tool).  After discovering Tungle (via word of mouth), I was so excited about this calendar tool that I wrote about it in my blog.  About a day after the post went up, I got a personal e-mail from Marc thanking me for the post.  After another month or so, Marc scheduled a phone conference with me to chat about the tool.  He asked me what I liked, and what I wished that it would do.  Not only that, but he encouraged me to tell my friends who also used the tool to send any ideas directly to him.  Before you say that this is impractical, understand that Tungle has multiple channels of feedback collection and they have incorporated personal conversations as part of this feedback.

How to Take Advantage of These Trends

  1. Create a “customer experience” champion in your organization. Companies are starting to create departments and people who basically serve as the depository of real-time customer feedback.  They receive all the feedback and notify the appropriate managers immediately.  They are given the freedom to take care of customer problems and improve the experience.
  2. Start monitoring social media chatter. Encourage employees to open corporate social media accounts.  Create account names that mention your company name.  For example @NPRscottsimon is the Twitter ID for Weekend Edition host Scott Simon on National Public Radio.
  3. Use IdeaScale to gather product improvement information.  Focus groups can be expensive and IdeaScale is a wonderful and cost-effective tool to engage customers in voicing their needs and wants.
  4. Open up your blog articles for comments. Use the feedback you’ve already received from customers to create blog articles that educate and inform your customers about the improvement programs you have going on.  Invite them to provide their input and respond to that input.

What trends have you noticed and what do you recommend as a way to take advantage of these trends?

About the Author: Ivana Taylor is CEO of Third Force, a strategic firm that helps small businesses get and keep their ideal customer. She’s the co-author of the book “Excel for Marketing Managers” and proprietor of DIYMarketers, a site for in-house marketers. Her blog is Strategy Stew.   You can reach her directly at Ivana@thirdforce.net.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Newsletter · customer research

The Frequent Responder Paradox

February 1, 2010 · Leave a Comment

There is a paradox in the market research industry around respondents.  We do all we can think of to convince people to take our surveys.  When they respond enthusiastically to our pleas and become frequent responders, however, we tend to deride them as “professional respondents,” accuse them of “gaming the system” and doubt the accuracy of their answers. This contradiction can hurt our credibility with the public we are seeking to engage in our research.

Moreover, our distrust of frequent responders has been proven to be unfounded.  Studies that Survey Sampling International (SSI) and our clients have conducted examining responses of frequent vs. less frequent responders show little, if any, correlation between response frequency and quality.

Frequent Responders Are Not Speeders

For instance, our research reveals no evidence that frequent responders try to speed through surveys.  They are no more likely than less frequent responders, for example, to select “none of the above” on questions such as what brands they have purchased in a category over the last three months.    In fact, they make a relatively high number of marks on “check all that apply” questions.

To illustrate that point, consider a section of one survey that presented a “brand imagery” grid question that asked respondents to indicate which of the 17 – 19 statements (depending on the category) exemplified each brand of which they were aware.  The frequent responder group indicated, on average, that 46% of the statements applied to a brand included in three categories.  Among the entire group, respondents, on average, associated only 40% of the statements with a brand.

A second survey, which focused specifically on the effects of panel tenure and response frequency, reinforced that frequent responders do not rush through surveys.  The data revealed response integrity among heavy responders.    As would be expected, the very experienced panelist s moved through the survey somewhat more quickly than new panelists.  Their shorter completion times, however, appear to be the result of their greater experience and dexterity in navigating the survey page and instructions, not of speeding.

Frequent Responders May Be More in Synch with Actual Consumer Behavior

Our research shows some evidence that responses from frequent responders actually may be more in line with real-world consumer behavior than responses from less frequent responders.  Intent-to-buy scores are often over inflated in consumer survey research.  Our research shows, however, that very experienced panelists have scores that are not as over inflated.  Therefore, they appear to be more in synch with actual behavior.

This finding contradicts conventional wisdom that past participation is not desirable.  That contradiction raises a key question.  Are the scores from very experienced panelists more in line with reality for a good reason—they don’t have a desire to answer in an expected way, so they are more truthful?  Or are their scores different for a bad reason—respondents want to get through the survey quickly and have discovered from their experience that answers indicating heavier usage and greater enthusiasm to buy often result in more follow up questions?

Our results indicate that the latter is not true.  Experienced respondents are not trying to rush through the survey by under-reporting usage and intent-to-buy.

Conclusions

In today’s environment, when consumers are faced with a daily barrage of hundreds or even thousands of marketing message and survey opportunities, it may be time to re-think traditional ideas about what it means to be a frequent responder—and what effect past survey participation has on research results.  Before “blacklisting” frequent survey takers, the industry needs to undertake further research and revise some potentially outdated assumptions about survey frequency, if the evidence continues to show it doesn’t affect quality.

While it’s important to be vigilant against fraud, research shows that real survey “cheaters” are a tiny minority of survey takers.  In fact, the major causes of poor quality responses are fatigue, boredom and ineffective survey design.

There is much the industry can do to engage respondents.  At SSI, for example, we’ve formed a focused Respondent Experience Team that is dedicated to engaging and serving respondents, checking surveys from the point of view of the people taking them.  Research proves that better survey design and keeping respondents happier directly improves data quality.

Respondents should be viewed as customers, just as companies who commission research are.  They should be encouraged, consulted, engaged and valued—not locked out for frequent participation.

NOTE: For a copy of the white paper The Effects of Survey Frequency on Panelists’ Responses with the full results of the studies cited in this article and to share your comments, go to www.Research-Voice.com.

About the Author: Chris DeAngelis is the Vice President of North American Sales for Survey Sampling International.  SSI provides access to more than 6 million research respondents in 54 countries. Sources include SSI proprietary panel communities in 27 countries, a growing portfolio of managed affiliates, and our extensive global partner network.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Best Practice

Goal or Promise? Which is more Powerful?

January 29, 2010 · Leave a Comment

I was watching a video on iLearningGlobal.tv. Bill Bartmann, one of the lecturers on iLearningGlobal was discussing the difference between a goal and a promise. He mentioned a study at Yale Medical School that where 70% of the people who set goals do not meet them but 98% of the people who set promises to themselves meet the promise.

So what is the difference between a goal and a promise?

A promised is defined as a declaration that something will or will not be done. A goal is defined as the result or achievement toward which effort is directed.

Is a promise a specific outcome whereas a goal is result? It seems the person making the promise has more at stake than the person setting a goal. Is the word goal so over used that the mind (both conscious and subconscious) dismisses it as a trite overused phase that has no negative consequences if it is not achieved. Is the mind saying that you almost never meet your goals so why would this be any different? Or is a promise a more serious commitment to yourself and others? Is there more at stake personally and emotionally if you renege on a promise?

I do not make promises lightly. I would suggest that is one of the reasons they work. A promise is far more personal than a goal. A goal is usually given to us by an external source: manager, customer, market, etc. Where as a promise is personal, only we can make it and only we can break it. Because I do not make promises easily, I will think long and hard before I make a promise. I set goals all the time. I do not always reach my goals. When I make a promise I will move heaven and earth to make the promise happen.

One promise I made to myself is that I would not be late for a meetings, dates, parties, or any commitment I make. I see being on time as a sign of respect and caring for the people I am meeting. If for any reason I cannot make a commitment (or I am going to be late), I will call so they are not waiting. I can think of two times I was late in the last 20 years. I can think of only one meeting I missed because I missed read by calendar.

After listening to Bartmann, maybe I should set fewer goals and make more promises?

What do you think? Is making a promise more serious than setting a goal? If so, why?

About the Author: Ron Finklestein is an author and success coach.  His company, AKRIS works with entrepreneurs and business owners who want to build their business and balance their life.  Ron is called “Your Small Business Success Expert” by his clients because of his passion for their success and his knowledge of business.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: marketing strategy

Where Does the Social in Social Media Come From, Boss?

January 27, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Have you been asked that question lately?

In business, it’s akin to children asking their parents where babies come from.  That awkward moment, you hope, is during a quiet moment at home free from grandparents and neighbors. You know it’s coming. You just don’t know when.

Many business leaders know a similar moment is coming. It is when they are asked  “Where does social in social media come from, Boss?” They just hope that moment comes with no one around, in their  office free from agencies and co-workers, vendors and partners.

So where does the social in social media come from?

For some businesses, they wish an agency would drop a social media campaign on their company. Like storks dropping a baby in the night on unsuspecting parents. These businesses wish an agency would drop a  social media bundle, neatly tied with a bow, on their desk one morning.

The agency, like the stork, flies away having conducted its business and picked up its check.

And the social media campaign remains on the desk. Over time its cooing becomes an annoyance, an interruption in the day. A distraction.  And the pretty colors, the conversations and tweets, comments and communities, profiles and videos soon are abandoned and grow silent. Everyone walks away.

Or the kid, you know the intern, who’s all over Facebook and MySpace and can text one hundred words a minute (in a secret language only their friends understand…) can do this social media thing….They can. With their friends. Who aren’t your clients, your employees, your prospects.

Social media. See. Social comes first in social media.  Too much is spent discussing the media and forgetting the social of social media.

Social  doesn’t come from agencies or Twitter/Facebook/YouTube, even. Social in social media comes from conversations. In-person. One-to-one. The conversations you inspire or instigate with co-workers and colleagues, family and friends.  In business it comes from the conversations you can create and spur, and most importantly allow,  among ALL your stakeholders. Employees and customers, partners and vendors.  These are unscripted, spontaneous, digressions and debates, arguments and collaborations, celebrations and setbacks.

Organizations whose cultures allow their stakeholders, all of them, to engage in these social interactions, organizations whose leaders listen as much if not more than they talk are where you will find the social in social media.

So. Before you wish for an agency to bequeath you a social media something (program, campaign, strategy) or think you can do it on the cheap with an enthusiastic entry-level employee…ask yourself if your organization answers, every day in every way,  Where does the social in social media come from?

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Social Media

Final Thoughts on Segmentation Analysis

January 26, 2010 · Leave a Comment

QuestionPro  had a wonderful opportunity to host an online seminar training session with Kathryn Korostoff  of Research Rockstar (www.researchrockstar.com) called, “Divide and Conquer: Practical Steps to Market Segmentation” on Wed January 20th, 2010.

Some of the most practical tips we can immediately carry out are the following:

1- In the process of doing a segmentation research it is important to set your own objectives and continually revisit your objectives to ensure you are staying on budget during the entire project.

2- You must also spend time to decide if it is demographic based or research based research. For example: A mock trial would need to reflect the demographics of the county to which it is held, whereas, a smart phone study may want to target current smart phone users who can offer a lot of feedback on a features and benefits research study.

3- Make sure your team spends qualify time brainstorming from beginning to end. Often times brainstorm sessions are done too quickly, are one-sided, or certain sections were not thought through well enough. In the end it would just cost more money and more time to finish your research project.

4- Research what will be the most efficient and cost-effective way to research your “Slam Dunk” audience. This is my favorite word used by Kathryn during the seminar. I’ve always known it as Core Customers, but Slam Dunk sounds much more fun.

Simply put: Effective research + targeted marketing campaign towards Slam Dunk audience = higher revenue.

In a do-it-yourself economy, technology has been the key cost saver for many companies who need to do in-depth research. It can also help avoid common pitfalls found in research studies. QuestionPro survey software tools have aided many clients in preventing poorly written surveys (survey wizard) and strong data analysis tools that are available right away. With Kathryn’s practical tips on segmentation and easy-to-use market research software found on QuestionPro, you are ready your company’s market research goals to a whole new level.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: QuestionPro · customer research · marketing strategy

Why We’re Not Fans of Net Promoter

January 25, 2010 · 3 Comments

Net Promoter has been a popular business metric for years.  We understand the number’s appeal; it is a well thought-out and reliable predictor of sales growth.  But it can fail your organization in one of the most critical ways.

Back before I was ever in the software-for-retailers business, I was simply in the retail business.  I owned and operated a chain of retail stores.

One day I had the idea that it would be great to circulate a weekly memo to everyone in my company.  I’d outline our goals for the week, celebrate victories, observe trends and champion ways to improve. My first one weighed in at 3 pages, and included two charts and a photo.  It looked like an advertisement for desktop publishing software.  I was pretty proud of it.  That is, of course, until I realized that none of my employees could recall anything I’d written.

Following weeks saw the editor’s knife, and after a few months what remained was a weekly one-paragraph memo of fewer than forty or fifty words.  In 16-point type.  Each memo focused on not more than one concept together with some employee attaboys.  People read it, absorbed it and acted on it.  My broader literary abilities would have to lay dormant, pretty much until you came along.

My lesson was that my front-line employees had their own daily routine and priorities, which are intimately connected to the substance of their daily job on the store floor.  Absorbing bigger business concepts and incorporating that information into how they performed their jobs could only happen if I didn’t overload them with too much stuff.  And the point where even very good employees tune-out is a lot lower than most managers realize.

The Problem with Net Promoter. Net Promoter, developed by consultant Frederick Reichheld, is a well thought-out and reliable predictor of sales growth.  You calculate Net Promoter by applying a formula to the result of asking your customers to grade how likely they are to refer your organization to a friend or colleague.

But there’s a problem.  Like version 1.0 of my employee memo, it is too complex to be used as a tool to coach the front lines of your organization.

To illustrate my point, try this two-part test.  First, see if you can remember the formula for calculating Net Promoter off the top of your head.  Over the years I’ve asked this question of a wide variety of people, and almost nobody can remember how to do it.  It’s so unintuitive as to escape the memory of almost everyone.

Second, try to imagine yourself and your front-line managers explaining that formula to every new hourly emplooyee hired in your company, and including that explanation in every review and staff meeting occurring throughout your organization daily.  It’s a formula for making eyes glaze over.

Let’s Remember Why We Measure. The goal of measuring customer experience isn’t just so you can know where you’re pleasing customers and where you’re not.  It’s to enable your field teams to change their behavior such that the customer experience improves and, presumably, sales go up by virtue of improved retention.  And that change requires enough simplicity that necessary actions are totally clear and can remain front-of-mind during your employees’ work day.

And the truth is that you don’t really sacrifice much by keeping it simple.  It’s not clear to us that the complexity of Net Promoter yields you anything.  When we compare store lists of our clients’ locations stack ranked by Net Promoter with, for example, a simple average grade on Recommend to a Friend those lists are remarkably similar.

Keeping it Simple. Though we generally ask the Recommend to a Friend question first, we always follow it with not more than a handful of the most actionable questions relating to the success of our client’s business.  And we always present the results to customer-facing employees in the simplest, clearest way possible.  (Usually a simple 30-day average grade.)  Employees waste no bandwidth trying to interpret what are clear, easy results.

Net Promoter might well have an application in your organization at the executive level.  But when it comes to driving up performance where your customer-facing employees are concerned, we’d encourage you to employ a much simpler measure.   Your employees will thank you.

About the Author:  Max Israel is the founder of Customerville, a Customer Satisfaction Measurement Solution for Multi-unit Operators that can help you create happier customers and drive sales.

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Newsletter · customer research

Five Tips for Getting Your Press Release Published

January 22, 2010 · Leave a Comment

You have something interesting to share and you’d like to get a mention in the press. Trouble is, news staffs are getting smaller as the volume of ideas vying for their attention is getting bigger. Understanding the changes in the media industry can help to get your own news published. These tips should help you get noticed, which is the first step to getting mentioned.

  1. Don’t make the editors work. News rooms are short staffed. Most editors just don’t have time to mess with salvaging the tiny gems of information from a poorly written press release. The easier you make it for them to use the information you provide, the better your chances of getting a mention.
  2. Know who you’re sending to. Staff overturn can quickly screw up even the cleanest of email lists when your contact is no longer working there. Be sure to double check their Web site staff lists to make sure.
  3. Use a format that’s easy to manage. When sending information digitally, if you’re sending a file, be sure that is easy to “copy and paste” like a Word document. If your PDF format is set up so the text can’t be highlighted and copied, then don’t bother. Better yet, have your email body copy be the press release and avoid an attachment (and extra step) all together.
  4. Grab them before they even open your email. Editors can receive thousands of press releases every week via email. Make sure yours stands out with an email subject line that sparks their interest. Use specifics and details. “Gainesville Company Wins XYZ Award” is a far better subject line than “For Your Information.” “What 83% of Middle-age Men Prefer” is better than “Men’s Survey Information.”
  5. Sometimes “Snail Mail” gets faster results. With the huge volume of emails, your paper press release in a real envelope may be a sight for sore eyes. If you do send a “hard copy” through the mail (and have the time), envelopes that are hand addressed and use a real postage stamp are typically opened and read before mail that uses address labels or postage meters. You could even try using a bright envelope color to grab attention. And if you really want to make sure they get the information, invest in next-day air via UPS, FedEx, or Priority Mail. If grabbing the attention of a specific media resource is very important to your marketing, then it may be worth the investment. Be sure to offer the option of receiving the info digitally if they prefer.

Sometimes even the best information gets buried, but using these tips can help better your chances of getting noticed – and published – to enhance your overall media presence.

Patti Renner is known for her no-nonsense approach for effective marketing messages. A direct response copywriter, she specializes in helping small business perform better online. You can reach her at patti@pattirenner.com.



→ Leave a CommentCategories: Best Practice

NPR’s Social Media Survey Results: Social Media Builds Loyal, Happy Listeners

January 18, 2010 · 1 Comment

According to a recent Mashable article, while every other news media channel’s audience is falling off — NPR’s is growing!  In fact, Mashable goes on to say that NPR is the future of mainstream media!  They go on to say that the three primary drivers of these results are NPR’s focus on local news, social media and being ubiquitous.

NPR has recently reached out to do some research with their community – and social media was a key component of the research and the feedback.  Here is how they did it and some of what they learned:

The Purpose of the Social Media Survey and Inviting Participants

Lian Hansen introduced the survey on her Weekend Edition Sunday show.  One of the things that jumped out at me is the informal tone of the invitation;

“…we’d like your reactions and suggestions for WEEKEND EDITION’s social media efforts. Your thoughts on the conversations some of us have been able to have across Twitter and Facebook are important. You’ve alerted us to stories, suggested questions for guests and become a part of our program in ways that weren’t possible just a year ago.”

The mix of respondents came from a variety of sources:

… the NPR Listens national online listener panel, on-air call outs during Weekend Edition on December 19th & 20th, Facebook postings from Weekend Edition, as well as tweets from Liane Hansen, Scott Simon, myself and other Weekend Edition staff.

For so many of us, gathering respondents involves lists and more lists, and in this case, it was a simple announcement that allowed people from the social media to self-select.

Because the purpose of the survey was to get more direction from their social media community – creating an “open mic” space probably saved a lot of money and collected “good-enough” feedback.

What do YOU think?  What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of this type of methodology?

One of the wonderful aspects of gathering responses via social media is that you get immediate real time feedback from the audience in their real voice.  This kind of feedback almost has a type of “focus group” quality with one additional advantage — because the content is digital, you can search, tag and categorize the responses so that you can see the patterns that come up — and the real words your audience is using.

In what ways are you using social media as a way of gathering deeper, more colorful information from your customers and audiences?

Using social media in an intentional strategic way is a relatively new topic.  In fact, while many organizations know that this kind of information is available and valuable, few know how to take advantage of it to the point where it drives their strategic decisions.

It’s still not clear to me what NPR is going to do with the results - what specific changes will they make as a result?  It’s clear from the responses they’ve received that people felt more engaged, more special — as if they were behind the scenes.  This makes me wonder if the increased engagement will translate into more financial support.

What do YOU think?

Tell us about your experiences.  Have you asked your customers or audience about social media?  Does greater interaction and connection lead to a tighter bond between you and your customers?  Does it build loyalty?

About the Author: Ivana Taylor is CEO of Third Force, a strategic firm that helps small businesses get and keep their ideal customer. She’s the co-author of the book “Excel for Marketing Managers” and proprietor of DIYMarketers, a site for in-house marketers. Her blog is Strategy Stew.   You can reach her directly at Ivana@thirdforce.net.

→ 1 CommentCategories: marketing strategy